Originally posted by johnunit
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
help with 351w swap
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mercracer View PostOnly 96 and early 97 model year had GT40 heads. None had washer/spacer arrangement for the bolt holes.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by torquelover View PostSo Ford put 7/16" head bolts through heads with 1/2" holes, without any type of special bushing or washer? Interesting. I thought the same thing the first time I pulled the exhaust manifolds off the 351 and noticed there were no gaskets.
Comment
-
Originally posted by torquelover View PostSo Ford put 7/16" head bolts through heads with 1/2" holes, without any type of special bushing or washer? Interesting. I thought the same thing the first time I pulled the exhaust manifolds off the 351 and noticed there were no gaskets.http://secondhandracing.com/Home.aspx
http://secondhandradio.com/
R.I.P. Jason P Harrill 6-12-06
http://www.grandmarq.net/vb/showthread.php?t=5634
Comment
-
Originally posted by DuceAnAHalf View Postnot really needed since the heads are actually located on the block by the two steel roll pins in the bottom corners of the block.
Comment
-
I think the source of confusion might stem from the recommendation to use special washers or bushings of some sort when using 7/16" bolts on aluminium heads with 1/2" holes. After reading about aftermarket stuff, I was also surprised when I realized I'd just disassembled an engine with 7/16" bolts in 1/2" holes with no special provisions.2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!
Comment
-
I don't doubt what you guys are saying at all... about 7/16" bolts in 1/2" holes.
But I will point out that without having a larger bolt head, the bearing surface of the bolt head on the cylinder head itself is reduced.
A 7/16" bolt used in a properly sized hole has a larger contact area with the cylinder head than a 7/16" bolt in a 1/2" hole. sigma= p/a.
I'm not sure what the tensile strength of the bolts are, but where I work this kind of thing is definitely not acceptable. One of the components would surely yield if the bolt is torqued within close range of the yield strength. The yield would be far worse with aluminum heads, obviously.
However, with the way that most folks 'torque' bolts, they aren't getting a true depiction of the actual torque anyway.
Just an observation.**2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
**2006 MGM,"Ultimate": 4.6/ 2.73/ Dark Tint, Magnaflows, 19s, 115K Daily Driver
**2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider
**1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Truck Duties
Comment
-
Originally posted by mrltd View PostI thought the TTY bolts had a larger shank and large head to fit in the 1/2 hole in the head but still a 7/16" thread....
Comment
-
Originally posted by P72Ford View PostI'm not sure what the tensile strength of the bolts are, but where I work this kind of thing is definitely not acceptable.
Originally posted by mrltd View PostI thought the TTY bolts had a larger shank and large head to fit in the 1/2 hole in the head but still a 7/16" thread....2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1987cp View PostThen I guess you don't work at Ford, where as you know, "Good enough is."**2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
**2006 MGM,"Ultimate": 4.6/ 2.73/ Dark Tint, Magnaflows, 19s, 115K Daily Driver
**2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider
**1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Truck Duties
Comment
-
So no "Yeah, this should run good for about 5 years or 50,000 miles, after which it'll almost certainly blow to bits and the customer will be back for another new car"?2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!
Comment
Comment