Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Time to start spending money

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Originally posted by P72Ford View Post
    You never told me that...

    I used (at Scott's recommendation) BBK 15110 (the coated 1511's), on my car, and was very pleased with the quality and fit. I went with the coated because I wanted them to look okay down the road. Also, make sure you buy some better gaskets (the ones included are garbage), and possibly some better hardware.
    Are you running a Performer RPM intake manifold? I was making a recommendation for the RPM, not the basic Performer, however, the open spacer can't hurt any on the basic performer, if you have the hood clearance.

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by Pirate View Post
      Are you running a Performer RPM intake manifold? I was making a recommendation for the RPM, not the basic Performer, however, the open spacer can't hurt any on the basic performer, if you have the hood clearance.
      Nah, not the performer. I have the EGR spacer in place anyway, so I'm not sure whether I have the clearance or not. The intake is pretty low rise, so there may be room.
      **1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Cruiser
      **2004 F-150 XLT 4WD RCLB: 4.6/ 4R70, 3.55, 90K Daily Driver
      **2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
      **2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider

      Comment


        #78
        Originally posted by P72Ford View Post
        You never told me that...

        I used (at Scott's recommendation) BBK 15110 (the coated 1511's), on my car, and was very pleased with the quality and fit. I went with the coated because I wanted them to look okay down the road. Also, make sure you buy some better gaskets (the ones included are garbage), and possibly some better hardware.
        Funny reason to drop the coin on coated headers ... I the main advantage is their greater resistance to bleeding heat off into the engine compartment, instead keeping it in the exhaust gas itself to keep up the velocity and promote scavenging.

        +50 on upgrading to Mr. Gasket Copperseal exhaust gaskets. Those things rock!
        2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

        Comment


          #79
          Originally posted by 1987cp View Post

          +50 on upgrading to Mr. Gasket Copperseal exhaust gaskets. Those things rock!
          I agree on the gaskets....I just installed a set, and now my sex life is 800% better!

          Comment


            #80
            Alright I took your advice on the headers and carb spacer. Now I'm having problems getting the right flywheel/clutch for this thing. The fella at the parts store got me a 28oz balance flywheel out of a 85 f-150 and a clutch from a 90 stang. The problem is the fact that the pressure plate bolt holes are about a half inch off all around(too small). If I get a clutch made for the f-150 will it work with the '90 t-5 (spline count/fit in the bell housing)?
            1984 CV tudor 351W, 4bbl, 5-speed best time in the 1/8 8.39 at 80 with 1.80 60ft time.
            2006 P71, 1988 Bronco II, 1986 Baby LTD(5.0 & T5 swap in progress), 1976 16' Hobie Cat, 12' AquaFinn
            http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2651997 UPDATED 20100826
            sigpic

            Comment


              #81
              Originally posted by Pesty351 View Post
              Alright I took your advice on the headers and carb spacer. Now I'm having problems getting the right flywheel/clutch for this thing. The fella at the parts store got me a 28oz balance flywheel out of a 85 f-150 and a clutch from a 90 stang. The problem is the fact that the pressure plate bolt holes are about a half inch off all around(too small). If I get a clutch made for the f-150 will it work with the '90 t-5 (spline count/fit in the bell housing)?
              You are going to need to get the Mustang 28-ounce flywheel, as if memory serves me correctly, the installed height of the truck pressure plate is different....the Mustang clutch (1987-up, I think) is a 10.5" clutch, with the truck being an 11"...I would just measure the diapragm finger depth of both the Mustang and Truck pressure plates to verify.

              Comment


                #82
                All the Mustang ones the parts store looked up were 50 oz. Any other ideas out there or maybe part numbers that would be awesome.
                1984 CV tudor 351W, 4bbl, 5-speed best time in the 1/8 8.39 at 80 with 1.80 60ft time.
                2006 P71, 1988 Bronco II, 1986 Baby LTD(5.0 & T5 swap in progress), 1976 16' Hobie Cat, 12' AquaFinn
                http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2651997 UPDATED 20100826
                sigpic

                Comment


                  #83
                  Try a 1979 Mustang. The earlier 302 ones that weren't HO would work.
                  1983 Grand Marquis 2Dr Sedan "Mercules"
                  Tremec TKO conversion, hydraulic clutch, HURST equipped!

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Wasn't it '81 or so that they switched to the new-style crank that uses the 50 ounce imbalance?

                    I notice Summit lists a variety of diamaters in the flywheel section .... wonder if that could help if scaring up a replacement part doesn't work out ....
                    2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!

                    Comment


                      #85
                      Nobody in town seems to show any part numbers for a 79-81 mustang flywheel. Why is this so hard to get a stupid flywheel.
                      1984 CV tudor 351W, 4bbl, 5-speed best time in the 1/8 8.39 at 80 with 1.80 60ft time.
                      2006 P71, 1988 Bronco II, 1986 Baby LTD(5.0 & T5 swap in progress), 1976 16' Hobie Cat, 12' AquaFinn
                      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2651997 UPDATED 20100826
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                        #86
                        Originally posted by Pesty351 View Post
                        Nobody in town seems to show any part numbers for a 79-81 mustang flywheel. Why is this so hard to get a stupid flywheel.
                        Dorman #04392

                        Pioneer #FW163

                        Or, the INEXPENSIVE option!

                        Standard Flywheels #172

                        These are all off the partsamerica.com site. Might have to get it ordered, but there it is
                        1983 Grand Marquis 2Dr Sedan "Mercules"
                        Tremec TKO conversion, hydraulic clutch, HURST equipped!

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by Grand_Marquis_GT View Post
                          Dorman #04392

                          Pioneer #FW163

                          Or, the INEXPENSIVE option!

                          Standard Flywheels #172

                          These are all off the partsamerica.com site. Might have to get it ordered, but there it is
                          Tom, this flywheel uses a 10" clutch, instead of a 10.5" unit like the 1987-up 5.0 Mustangs....and there aren't too many aftermarket replacements that are going to hold up behind a 351W...

                          Here's the only aftermarket unit I could locate...
                          http://store.summitracing.com/partde...2&autoview=sku


                          One other note? You might be able to run a stock Mustang 50-ounce down to a local engine machine shop, and have the flywheel weight cut down to a 28-ounce bob...
                          Last edited by Guest; 11-05-2008, 01:34 PM.

                          Comment


                            #88
                            I'd go with the unit Pirate just suggested.
                            1983 Grand Marquis 2Dr Sedan "Mercules"
                            Tremec TKO conversion, hydraulic clutch, HURST equipped!

                            Comment


                              #89
                              Originally posted by Pirate View Post
                              One other note? You might be able to run a stock Mustang 50-ounce down to a local engine machine shop, and have the flywheel weight cut down to a 28-ounce bob...
                              Now thats an idea.
                              1984 CV tudor 351W, 4bbl, 5-speed best time in the 1/8 8.39 at 80 with 1.80 60ft time.
                              2006 P71, 1988 Bronco II, 1986 Baby LTD(5.0 & T5 swap in progress), 1976 16' Hobie Cat, 12' AquaFinn
                              http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2651997 UPDATED 20100826
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                                #90
                                Took some picts today. Thought I would share.
                                Attached Files
                                1984 CV tudor 351W, 4bbl, 5-speed best time in the 1/8 8.39 at 80 with 1.80 60ft time.
                                2006 P71, 1988 Bronco II, 1986 Baby LTD(5.0 & T5 swap in progress), 1976 16' Hobie Cat, 12' AquaFinn
                                http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2651997 UPDATED 20100826
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X