I should've added, in a car weighing as much as a Panther.
![]() |
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The 351W Long-Rod Thread of Doom.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by P72Ford View PostThis isn't an ideal situation. It most definitely is not adiabatic, even given the elevated cycle speed.2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!
Comment
-
Originally posted by CheeseSteakJim View PostWhat kind of fuel economy could you possibly see with this kind of motor, say with 3.55's?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1987cp View PostTrue, but the faster a gas is compressed, the less heat escapes during the compression process, and the closer it approximates actual adiabatic compression. In my Physics II lab we did an approximation of adiabatic expansion by using an acrylic cylinder and slamming the piston upward as quickly as possible. Obviously, the groups who moved the piston the fastest got the best results.
Comment
-
Actually, I've been doing some thinking.
Technically, I believe you could assume adiabatic conditions. The reason I say this, is because I do not believe there is a significant change in component temperature for every cycle.
Once the engine reaches operating temperature, the temperature of the piston and cyliner walls probably stays fairly constant. Yes, evertime combustion occurs, more heat is added, but the components have more than likely reached thermal equilibrium. Temperature does not continue to climb, just because you are adding heat (ie, boiling water). So, in theory, it isn't adiabatic, because heat is being added each time combustion occurs. But in reality, I think we can say it is adiabatic, as once operating temperature is reached, the effects of the added heat from combustion, is negligible.
I'd like to see a plot of cylinder wall/ piston temperature, as a function of engine cycle to say for sure.
I would say the internal combustion engine is less of a control volume, and more of a closed system, processing units of air and fuel at a time.**1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Cruiser
**2004 F-150 XLT 4WD RCLB: 4.6/ 4R70, 3.55, 90K Daily Driver
**2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
**2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider
Comment
-
Originally posted by P72Ford View PostI'd like to see a plot of cylinder wall/ piston temperature, as a function of engine cycle to say for sure.2012 Mazda5 Touring | Finally working on the LTD again!
Comment
-
Unfortunately not... Larry is going to be pissed that we are messing up his thread...**1976 Ford F-150 4WD: 360, 4 spd, 3.50s, factory A/C, 4" lift, Bilsteins, US Indy Mags, 35s Cruiser
**2004 F-150 XLT 4WD RCLB: 4.6/ 4R70, 3.55, 90K Daily Driver
**2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302: 5.0/ 6 spd/ 3.73s, 20K Cruiser
**2012 Harley Davidson Wide Glide (FXDWG):103/ Cobra Speedsters/ Cosmetics, 9K Poseur HD Rider
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pirate View PostI've heard claims of 19-21 in a 5.0 Mustang, and with the iron-headed motor I built, he was getting around 18 freeway with a C4 and a 3.50 gearset/Ford 9" rear, with 245/60R 15's on the rear (1969 Ranchero, if I recall correctly). I never got to hear about what mileage the AFR-headed engine I built, as it got sold off to someone else after I built it.
Did your client's C4 have OD?
Comment
-
Originally posted by CheeseSteakJim View PostI saw the 19-21 in a Fox-body also, but he didn't mention what gears he was running. If 4.10s were being used, that highway economy is fan-freaking-tastic - but if he's running 2.73's then I'd say that's terrible.
Did your client's C4 have OD?
Comment
-
http://waynesengines.com/index.htm
The site is back up....these are the guys that sell modded 5.565 Chevy 400 rods for 302's, and modded 400 Ford rods for 351W's....prices are around $275-$300 for a set of rods.
Comment
Comment