Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

289 question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by mrltd
    Roller block has a better rear main seal for one. And hmm...roller cam...

    bull on the rear seal. 5.0 is a weaker block. Roller cam can be done on either block.
    Scars are tatoos of the fearless

    Comment


      #17
      A 2 piece seal is better?
      Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

      Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

      Comment


        #18
        Only easyer to change.
        Scars are tatoos of the fearless

        Comment


          #19
          Rods are perty much the same except for 289 HIPO. 302 crank and rods will fit a 289. As well as most stroker kits.
          Scars are tatoos of the fearless

          Comment


            #20
            That's the only reason I could think of....Don't have to pull the tranny.
            Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

            Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by mrltd
              That's the only reason I could think of....Don't have to pull the tranny.
              Two piece you pull the oil pan and rear cap and can sneek one in. One piece gots to pull the trany. Which is easier might depend on the car its in.
              Scars are tatoos of the fearless

              Comment


                #22
                i think you should go ahead and do a 200ci I6... or hell, why not just do a 2.3L i4.


                grand_marquis_gt: "Wow dude, you got the GMGT sedan!"


                there, now im cool too

                Comment


                  #23
                  2.3L Turbo's are the best...
                  Builder/Owner of Badass Panther Wagons

                  Busy maintaining a fleet of Fords

                  Comment


                    #24
                    I have a one of a kind 250 I6 with about 300 Hp. Most partss were custom or home made. Had a 200 I6 that got 45 MPG.
                    Scars are tatoos of the fearless

                    Comment


                      #25
                      289's were badass.......dont see why it wouldnt work with efi if you go with maf

                      1986 lincoln towncar signature series. 5.0 HO with thumper performance ported e7 heads, 1.7 roller rockers, warm air intake, 65mm throttle body, 1/2" intake spacer, ported intakes, 3.73 rear with trac lock, 98-02 front brake conversion, 92-97 rear disc conversion, 1" rear swaybar, 1 3/16" front swaybar, 16" wheels and tires, loud ass stereo system, badass cb, best time to date 15.94 at 87 mph. lots of mods in the works 221.8 rwhp 278 rwt
                      2006 Lincoln Town Car Signature. Stock for now
                      1989 Ford F-250 4x4 much much more to come, sefi converted so far.
                      1986 Toyota pickup with LSC wheels and 225/60/16 tires.
                      2008 Hyundai Elantra future Revcon toad
                      1987 TriBurner and 1986 Alaska stokers keeping me warm. (and some pesky oil heat)

                      please be patient, rebuilding an empire!

                      Comment


                        #26
                        I've heard the 289 block had shorter cylinder walls and 302 guts wouldn't work in there because of that. But whatever I was reading said you could use 289 guts in a 302 block. This was in Mustang & Fords Magazine a couple years ago, but they have been known to be wrong before.
                        1990 Country Squire - under restoration
                        1988 Crown Vic LTD Wagon - daily beater

                        GMN Box Panther History
                        Box Panther Horsepower and Torque Ratings
                        Box Panther Production Numbers

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Tiggie
                          I've heard the 289 block had shorter cylinder walls and 302 guts wouldn't work in there because of that. But whatever I was reading said you could use 289 guts in a 302 block. This was in Mustang & Fords Magazine a couple years ago, but they have been known to be wrong before.

                          The cylinder skirts were extended on the 302 to handle the increased loads because of the .13" longer stroke. This does not mean that you will have a cylinder block failure if you run a 3" stroke in a 289 block. I have never heard of any problems with a 302 with a 289 block. I would have no worries doing so.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X