Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

does removing emission stuff effect the engine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Umm....Just removing the emissions equipment is'nt a good enough reason to dyno it.The butt dyno proves it to me though.
    Last edited by LTDMan83; 07-23-2006, 07:03 AM.

    Comment


      #17
      If the emissions crap is working properly, it won't actually do anything to negatively affect engine performance or function. The cats, when not clogged, involve a pretty minimal restriction. The stock exhaust beyond the cats is more of a restriction especially on a single exhaust car. The air injection doesn't do anything but warm the cats up faster. The smog pump is a pretty minimal drag, but most people remove it either because its going bad and making noise, or just to clean up engine bay clutter. The EGR doesn't hurt performance either since its only open at cruise, and not WOT. Same thing with the fuel tank vapor canister. Thats really the only emissions junk on the car. Most people have problems they associate with the smog controls because of vacuum leaks on the solenoids or lines. Removing this stuff usually involves capping off the lines which causes better performance because its not leaking anymore. Properly working vac lines will also do the same thing.
      86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
      5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley

      91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry

      1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal

      Originally posted by phayzer5
      I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers

      Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works

      Comment


        #18
        go look up how much hp removing your ac gains you, maybe 2 hp? i didnt only remove emissions i removed the ac along with everything else so therefore i have one small ass belt compared to 2 running running only the alt, power steering, crank. i dont need to dyno my car to know that it increased power its just common sense.. how much it gained? probably not much but i didnt say it increased like 50 horsepower or anything either.

        agreed?
        Last edited by cld783; 07-23-2006, 05:40 PM.
        Give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will promptly forget that he once did not know, and proceed to call anyone who asks, a n00b and flame them on the boards for being stupid.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by cld783
          go look up how much hp removing your ac gains you, maybe 2 hp? i didnt only remove emissions i removed the ac along with everything else so therefore i have one small ass belt compared to 2 running running only the alt, power steering, crank. i dont need to dyno my car to know that it increased power its just common sense.. how much it gained? probably not much but i didnt say it increased like 50 horsepower or anything either.

          agreed?
          The biggest diff I found, was the car had a little more power at cruising, and tackled the hills easier... Because less parasitic gain...
          1983 Grand Marquis 2Dr Sedan "Mercules"
          Tremec TKO conversion, hydraulic clutch, HURST equipped!

          Comment


            #20
            Umm....Just removing the emissions equipment is'nt a good enough reason to dyno it.The butt dyno proves it to me though.
            CLD is on track, maybe 2hp is something realistic, but saying you can 'feel' a difference in the seat of your pants is rather subjective.

            Eric S. ran a back to back dyno run with a cold-air intake and the stock intake and had identical rear-wheel horsepower output. That is a true test, not a butt test, and I'd be willing to be 9/10 people who put a cold-air intake on their car say it 'feels faster' then with the original.

            Catch my drift?

            ~Adam

            '85 2-Door Crown Victoria
            302 HO, -0.022" E7 Heads, Weiand Dual Plane Intake, Edelbrock 1406 Carb, Mechanical Fuel Pump, HEI Distributor, 180* T-stat, Transgo Shift Kit, HO Governor, Lokar TV/Throttle Cable Setup, B&M Torq Master 2000 RPM Stall Converter, FRPP Trans Cooler, Mustang Shorty Headers, 2.25" Dual Exhaust, Flowtech H-pipe (no converters), Hooker AeroChamber Mufflers, Side-exit Exhaust w/ Chromed 2.5" Tips, '02 PI F/R Shocks, Cut 2004 PI Front Springs in the Rear, PI Rear Sway Bar, 17" SAP Wheels, 245/50/Z17 Michelin Pilot A/S Tires, Cold A/C, Cruise Control, 4.10 Rear End Gears, Trac Lok Diff.
            '04 Crown Victoria LX Sport, '02 Jeep Liberty
            '83 Suzuki GS 1100E Motorcycle[/color]

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by AOD
              CLD is on track, maybe 2hp is something realistic, but saying you can 'feel' a difference in the seat of your pants is rather subjective.

              Eric S. ran a back to back dyno run with a cold-air intake and the stock intake and had identical rear-wheel horsepower output. That is a true test, not a butt test, and I'd be willing to be 9/10 people who put a cold-air intake on their car say it 'feels faster' then with the original.

              Catch my drift?

              ~Adam
              true that.. i have cai as well so im sure its a combo of all the things that i noticed.. just emissions you probably wouldnt notice much at all.
              Give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will promptly forget that he once did not know, and proceed to call anyone who asks, a n00b and flame them on the boards for being stupid.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by AOD
                Eric S. ran a back to back dyno run with a cold-air intake and the stock intake and had identical rear-wheel horsepower output. That is a true test, not a butt test, and I'd be willing to be 9/10 people who put a cold-air intake on their car say it 'feels faster' then with the original.

                ~Adam

                But did he put the sticker for the CAI on the rear window? If not, the CAI was not activated and it produced no extra power. With the sticker installed, it produces approximately 2.5 extra horsepower.


                I read somewhere that it takes roughly a 10% gain in power to actually feel a noticeable difference, so thats 15 horsepower. You probably "gain" as much by the weight reduction of pulling parts as actual power gains.
                86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
                5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley

                91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry

                1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal

                Originally posted by phayzer5
                I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers

                Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works

                Comment


                  #23
                  thats why we removed the ac on the cop car......power to weight and the new engine is going to be a 347 vortec supercharged with AFR heads and still no ac.
                  YouTube. FaceBook Crown Vic Group

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by AOD
                    Eric S. ran a back to back dyno run with a cold-air intake and the stock intake and had identical rear-wheel horsepower output. That is a true test, not a butt test, and I'd be willing to be 9/10 people who put a cold-air intake on their car say it 'feels faster' then with the original.

                    Catch my drift?

                    ~Adam
                    WTF does that have to do with what we were discussing in this thread?The fact that Eric S. dyno'ed his regular CAI and saw no difference,and I dyno'ed my custom made CAI (which has been sold) and and saw 10+HP at 4000rpm,only says that Eric S. dos'ent know what he's doing as far as making CAI's.We allready disussed this on CVN months ago,I'm not going to get into it again.
                    Last edited by LTDMan83; 07-25-2006, 03:15 PM.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Sure, AOD was being abrasive.

                      Dyno numbers may be the death of us all, but it's all what feels good. Usually, that feeling faster is just improved throttle response, and sound
                      1983 Grand Marquis 2Dr Sedan "Mercules"
                      Tremec TKO conversion, hydraulic clutch, HURST equipped!

                      Comment


                        #26
                        If your putting a standard cold air intake on a stock 5.0 sefi motor, its not going to make a difference but looks better than the stock airbox. A CFI motor might benefit from a cold air intake but I don't know how restrictive the throttle body and intake manifold are. I tried it on my completely stock 130k sefi engine, didn't really notice anything. If its a really good intake and the filter is mounted outside the engine compartment, maybe it will but I don't know. It will sound like you have a supercharger on a cold day though, which nobody every expects to hear from an old panther.

                        Take a look at the 50mm throttle body and the egr spacer, its so pathetic that the stock airbox can outflow that setup. Bolt in a true cold air intake with the complete HO upper intake, then you have something on a lopo motor. I noticed a nice difference with a 1inch intake spacer, HO upper intake, HO throttle body, and a bored out to 63mm panther egr spacer. Im still using the stock airbox and noticed a little difference in low end torque and a much stronger powerband.

                        You can change the valve cover gaskets, the pcv valve, almost all the vacuum lines in the engine, replace injectors and much more once you remove the upper intake. Just be careful with wiring and vacuum lines, I got a wire for the IAC valve stuck under the driver's side valve cover.

                        Also, any increase in airflow is only going to help a little in the lopo, the e6 heads are a huge restriction on these. Stock e7 heads produce an easy 15-20hp increase on a lopo motor and these are considered restrictive heads on a stock mustang motor.
                        Current rides - 1991 Ford Thunderbird 3.8 v6 (gas saver/DD) - New Heads/Headgaskets with ARP studs, Air Silencer Delete, 70mm MAF, Plasti-dipped Matte Black with a Silver Metalflake Overlay, Muffler Delete, some LED's, 30.233 MPG for high MPG average!
                        2006 Jeep Wrangler 4WD (fun vehicle/backup DD) - 4.0/6spd - too many mods to list.

                        Associated Panthers:
                        Father's 1994 Ford Crown Victoria - Stock, 45,000 miles.
                        Sold in 2007 - 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis LS "Grandpa Special" 2 door.
                        http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2128327

                        Comment


                          #27
                          My car still have air pump and emission valve. Because in Vancouver, BC is the most SRICT emission.


                          Jason
                          1991 Mercury Grand Marquis LS - Current - June 2016 POTM Winner
                          1996 Mercury Grand Marquis LS - SOLD
                          1991 Mercury Grand Marquis LS - SOLD
                          1987 Mercury Grand Marquis LS 2dr - Long gone

                          Comment


                            #28
                            when can you get historic plates? even when your cars an 80 you still have to do emission's?

                            1989 mercury grand marquis gs / 2014 ford focus s daily driver
                            302 lopo with ho upper/ aod with trans go shift kit
                            k code 3:55 posi rear/big brake swap tow package car

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by gabegt90
                              when can you get historic plates? even when your cars an 80 you still have to do emission's?
                              thats a very good question..
                              Give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will promptly forget that he once did not know, and proceed to call anyone who asks, a n00b and flame them on the boards for being stupid.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Depends on the state. You'd need to check your local rules.
                                86 Lincoln Town Car (Galactica).
                                5.0 HO, CompCams XE258,Scorpion 1.72 roller rockers, 3.55 K code rear, tow package, BHPerformance ported E7 heads, Tmoss Explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, Hedman 1 5/8" headers, 2.5" dual exhaust, ASP underdrive pulley

                                91 Lincoln Mark VII LSC grandpa spec white and cranberry

                                1984 Lincoln Continental TurboDiesel - rolls coal

                                Originally posted by phayzer5
                                I drive a Lincoln. I can't be bothered to shift like the peasants and rabble rousers

                                Everything looks like voodoo if you don't understand how it works

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X